Guide
Why does Foreign Military Sales take so long?
The manual puts a clock on only part of the calendar: the is expected to offer 85% of Letters of Offer and Acceptance within 45 days to 150 days of the request, a congressional notification runs through an informal review of 20 days to 40 days and then a statutory 15 days or 30 days, and an accelerated-closure case is expected to close within 24 months of its last delivery. Most of the rest — the requirements work before the request, the wait for the , contracting and , reconciliation — carries no standard at all, and the manual's own list of extenuating factors explains why even the clocked stretch is met only 85% of the time.
Why does FMS take so long?
By policy, the should offer 85 percent of its cases within 45 to 150 days after the receipt of an , depending on the type and complexity of the case.
The DOD, DOS, and Congress are constantly trying to speed up the process by trying to reduce time in several different lanes to include the following: case development, foreign disclosure and technology transfer decisions, acquisition, contracting, and more.
Care should be taken when comparing timelines under and ; neither nor are faster than the other in general, and many factors impact delivery timelines. The acquisition process involves the development, review, and acceptance of the case, plus the assembling of requirements for economic quantity or consolidated purchasing cycles as well as contract negotiations and production lead times. An individual international partner’s priorities must be integrated into the overall DOD-acquisition priority in the process.
References
SAMM
- SAMM C5.T9 — Case Development Categories and Standards
- SAMM C5.2 — Letter of Request Submissions.
- SAMM C5.6.2 — Letter of Offer and Acceptance Document Preparation Timeframe.
- SAMM C5.6.3 — Holds During Case Development.
- SAMM C5.6.11 — Coordination and Countersignature of Letter of Offer and Acceptance Documents.
- SAMM C5.6.12 — Pen and Ink Changes.
- SAMM C5.7 — Congressional Notification - Arms Export Control Act 36(b) for Security Assistance Programs.
- SAMM C5.T22 — Tiered Review Periods
- SAMM C6.1 — Case Implementation
- SAMM C6.2 — Case Execution - General Information
- SAMM C16.3 — Closure.
Public authorities
- Arms Export Control Act of 1976, as amended, §36(b) (22 U.S.C. §2776(b)) — AECA §36(b)
- Accelerated Case Closure Procedures (ACCP) — ACCP
Facts referenced
- Case development standard — share of documents expected to meet the standard — 85% (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Case development standard — Category A (blanket order, CLSSA) — 45 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Case development standard — Category C (defined order with complicating factors) — 150 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Tiered review period — Tier 1 (NATO +5) — 20 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T22
- Tiered review period — Tier 3 (sensitive) — 40 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T22
- 36(b) statutory review period — NATO members, Australia, Israel, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand — 15 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.7
- 36(b) statutory review period — all other countries and international organizations — 30 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.7
- ACCP closure goal after Supply/Services Complete — all cases other than training — 24 months (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C16.3
- Case development standard — Category B (defined order) — 100 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Case development standard — Category D (BPC) — 60 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Case development clock start — Category A (blanket order, CLSSA) — Letter of Request (LOR) Receipt (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Case development clock start — Category B (defined order) — LOR Receipt (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Case development clock start — Category C (defined order with extenuating factors) — LOR Actionable (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Case development clock stop — Category A (Categories B and C state the same milestone) — Offer (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Case development clock stop — Category D (BPC) — BPC Wait (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T9
- Working days for IA comments on an LOR Advisory — 10 working days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.2
- Days after LOR receipt by which the IA is encouraged to follow up if the LOR is not yet actionable (no performance standard is set for this period) — 30 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.2.5.2.2
- Tiered review period — Tier 2 (other) — 30 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T22
- Formal congressional review period (Table C5.T23) — NATO countries and organizations, Australia, Israel, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand — 15 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T23
- Formal congressional review period (Table C5.T23) — all other countries and international organizations — 30 days (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.T23
- Latest an Offer Expiration Date extension may be requested without case restatement, counted from the current OED — 6 months (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C5.6.12.1
- ACCP closure goal after Supply/Services Complete — training cases — 36 months (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C16.3
- Estimated case closure date written into the LOA — ACCP cases, after projected final delivery or service performance — 24 months (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C16.3.3
- Estimated case closure date written into the LOA — non-ACCP cases, after closure of the longest underlying contract — 36 months (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C16.3.3
- Months after delivery during which a partner may submit a Supply Discrepancy Report, after which cases are closed (ACCP eligibility) — 12 months (as of 11 September 2026) — SAMM C16.3.1.1.1.1
Related
Implementing Agency (IA)
The military department or defense agency responsible for the execution of military assistance programs. With respect to FMS, the military department or defense agency assigned responsibility by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency to prepare an LOA and to implement an FMS case. The implementing agency is responsible for the overall management of the actions that will result in delivery of the materials or services set forth in the LOA that was accepted by a foreign country or international organization.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Initial Deposit
Funds that are required to cover outlays and/or deliveries that are anticipated to occur before the receipt of the first quarterly payment. These funds must accompany the accepted Letter of Offer and Acceptance.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
Production Lead Time
The time interval between the placement of a contract and receipt into the supply system of materiel purchased.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
LOA — Letter of Offer and Acceptance
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
Cooperative Logistics Supply Support Arrangements (CLSSA)
Military logistics support arrangements designed to provide responsive and continuous supply support at the depot level for U.S.-made military materiel possessed by foreign countries and international organizations. The CLSSA is normally the most effective means for providing common repair parts and secondary item support for equipment of U.S. origin that is in allied and friendly country inventories.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
CLSSA — Cooperative Logistics Supply Support Arrangement
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
Glossary entry →Cooperative Logistics Supply Support Arrangements (CLSSA) →
Letter of Request (LOR)
The term used to identify a request from an eligible FMS participant country for the purchase of U.S. defense articles and services. The request may be in message or letter format.
SAMM Glossary, as of 12 September 2026
LOR — Letter of Request
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
FMS — Foreign Military Sale
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026
DCS — Direct Commercial Sales
SAMM Acronyms, as of 12 September 2026